Leadership Development > Retention
Leadership Development: Invest in the Best So They’ll Invest in You
- November 16th, 2009
- 6 Comments
Last week, I listed the top traits recruiters and hiring managers look for when identifying their organization’s next leaders. Now, I’d like to follow up that post by discussing why now, more than ever, businesses need to put focus on developing their leaders (if they’re not already doing so) – and what areas they should concentrate on to get the best return on their investment.
Spending money on leadership development may seem like a lot to ask during a time when budgets are already tight, but it is critical that employers invest in ways to engage and retain their leaders right now, according to Elizabeth Craig, a research fellow at the Accenture Institute for High Performance in Boston, in a recent Business Insight podcast.
Unfortunately, businesses tend to see employee training and development programs as an expense, making these programs among the first to go when companies look for ways to cut costs. On the contrary, it is these very programs – these investments – that will better position companies’ competitive standing when the economy turns around. (Need a few more reasons to invest in leaders? We got five right here.)
Because executives have been shown to leave their companies when market conditions improve and more job opportunities open up, now is the time for companies to give them a reason to stay. The best way to retain these employees, Craig says, is to provide learning and development opportunities that will not only engage your best people and compel them to stay with you, but help you better attract new talent down the road.
Based on research Craig conducted with colleagues on executive satisfaction levels (which you can read about in more depth here) companies that offer the following opportunities for executives see a higher retention rate:
- Opportunities to work on challenging tasks and to take on more responsibility.
- Opportunities to broaden their skills by exposing them to operations outside their areas of expertise, and providing training to polish their business skills.
- Opportunities to cultivate relationships with their peers, enabling them to learn from their peers and increase visibility. As a bonus for the company, it also enables them to increase their understanding and collaboration among various business units.
What steps are you taking to invest in your leaders?
About Mary Lorenz
Mary is a copywriter for CareerBuilder, specializing in B2B marketing and corporate recruiting best practices and social media. In addition to creating copy for corporate advertising and marketing campaigns, she researches and writes about employee attraction, engagement and retention. Whenever possible, she makes references to pop culture. Sometimes, those references are even relevant. A New Orleans native, Mary now lives in Chicago, right down the street from the best sushi place in the city. It's awesome.All leaders (current and future) have different motivations. Tapping into these and aligning the future leader's goals with the corporate strategy is a way to increase performance and engagement. Providing unique development opportunities based on personal preference will demonstrate to your high potentials that you care about and understand their personal needs.
All leaders (current and future) have different motivations. Tapping into these and aligning the future leader's goals with the corporate strategy is a way to increase performance and engagement. Providing unique development opportunities based on personal preference will demonstrate to your high potentials that you care about and understand their personal needs.
This is even more true for highly sought after and hard to retain female leaders. Don't wait until they're recruited away to acknowledge their value to the organization. Contact info@polishyourstar.com about creating a Women's Leadership Coaching Circle for your female leader(s) and acknowledge her role as a mentor for high potential female employees at your organization and beyond.
Trackbacks
Stay Connected
- May 2013 (13)
- April 2013 (23)
- March 2013 (14)
- February 2013 (20)
- January 2013 (15)
- December 2012 (10)
- November 2012 (16)
- October 2012 (18)
- September 2012 (16)
- August 2012 (20)
- July 2012 (23)
- June 2012 (15)
- May 2012 (22)
- April 2012 (15)
- March 2012 (15)
- February 2012 (16)
- January 2012 (17)
- December 2011 (16)
- November 2011 (18)
- October 2011 (15)
- September 2011 (18)
- August 2011 (18)
- July 2011 (24)
- June 2011 (20)
- May 2011 (15)
- April 2011 (19)
- March 2011 (24)
- February 2011 (16)
- January 2011 (20)
- December 2010 (18)
- November 2010 (13)
- October 2010 (14)
- September 2010 (20)
- August 2010 (15)
- July 2010 (25)
- June 2010 (19)
- May 2010 (11)
- April 2010 (18)
- March 2010 (19)
- February 2010 (17)
- January 2010 (17)
- December 2009 (12)
- November 2009 (17)
- October 2009 (17)
- September 2009 (12)
- August 2009 (16)
- July 2009 (18)
- June 2009 (22)
- May 2009 (12)
- April 2009 (12)
- March 2009 (16)
- February 2009 (24)
- January 2009 (19)
- December 2008 (19)
- November 2008 (21)
- October 2008 (25)
- September 2008 (17)
- August 2008 (14)
- July 2008 (16)
- June 2008 (11)
- May 2008 (10)
- Benefits
- BLS
- careerbuilder
- CareerBuilder Survey
- Company Culture
- Corporate Philanthropy
- Economic Climate
- Economy
- Employee Benefits
- Employee Engagement
- Employee Morale
- Employment Branding
- Employment Branding
- empowering employment
- Facebook
- Generational Hiring
- Generation Y
- Gen Y
- Health Care
- Hiring
- Hiring Forecast
- Interview Questions
- Job Forecast
- Laid Off Workers
- Layoffs
- Leadership
- Leadership Development
- Matt Ferguson
- Millenials
- onboarding
- recession
- Recruiting
- Retention
- SHRM 2009
- SHRM Annual Conference
- skills gap
- Social Media
- Social Networking
- Social Recruiting
- Survey Results
- Talent Acquisition
- Telecommuting
- Twitter
- Work/Life Balance
- work life balance
Subscribe
- May 2013 (13)
- April 2013 (23)
- March 2013 (14)
- February 2013 (20)
- January 2013 (15)
- December 2012 (10)
- November 2012 (16)
- October 2012 (18)
- September 2012 (16)
- August 2012 (20)
- July 2012 (23)
- June 2012 (15)
- May 2012 (22)
- April 2012 (15)
- March 2012 (15)
- February 2012 (16)
- January 2012 (17)
- December 2011 (16)
- November 2011 (18)
- October 2011 (15)
- September 2011 (18)
- August 2011 (18)
- July 2011 (24)
- June 2011 (20)
- May 2011 (15)
- April 2011 (19)
- March 2011 (24)
- February 2011 (16)
- January 2011 (20)
- December 2010 (18)
- November 2010 (13)
- October 2010 (14)
- September 2010 (20)
- August 2010 (15)
- July 2010 (25)
- June 2010 (19)
- May 2010 (11)
- April 2010 (18)
- March 2010 (19)
- February 2010 (17)
- January 2010 (17)
- December 2009 (12)
- November 2009 (17)
- October 2009 (17)
- September 2009 (12)
- August 2009 (16)
- July 2009 (18)
- June 2009 (22)
- May 2009 (12)
- April 2009 (12)
- March 2009 (16)
- February 2009 (24)
- January 2009 (19)
- December 2008 (19)
- November 2008 (21)
- October 2008 (25)
- September 2008 (17)
- August 2008 (14)
- July 2008 (16)
- June 2008 (11)
- May 2008 (10)
- Benefits
- BLS
- careerbuilder
- CareerBuilder Survey
- Company Culture
- Corporate Philanthropy
- Economic Climate
- Economy
- Employee Benefits
- Employee Engagement
- Employee Morale
- Employment Branding
- Employment Branding
- empowering employment
- Generational Hiring
- Generation Y
- Gen Y
- Health Care
- Hiring
- Hiring Forecast
- Interview Questions
- Job Forecast
- Laid Off Workers
- Layoffs
- Leadership
- Leadership Development
- Matt Ferguson
- Millenials
- onboarding
- recession
- Recruiting
- Retention
- SHRM 2009
- SHRM Annual Conference
- skills gap
- Social Media
- Social Networking
- Social Recruiting
- Survey Results
- Talent Acquisition
- Telecommuting
- Work/Life Balance
- work life balance


















[...] Read More… [...]
[...] meant asking workers to take on heavier workloads with fewer resources and less pay. In fact, as I’ve mentioned before, it’s not unusual to see employees leave their companies following a downturn – when market [...]
[...] meant asking workers to take on heavier workloads with fewer resources and less pay. In fact, as I’ve mentioned before, it’s not unusual to see employees leave their companies following a downturn – when market [...]