Recruiter 1: “So, how’s your Facebook investigation going?”
Recruiter 2: “Oh, you know — finding the usual: Some inappropriate photos, tons of really poor communication skills, misspellings across the board.
Recruiter 3: “Really? I’ve been all over Twitter, and I’m finding that most candidates are showing a ton of creativity in their tweets and have a have really wide range of interests that would fit in great with our company culture.”
No, I didn’t overhear this conversation at my local watering hole last night (I know, shocker!). Chances are you didn’t, either — but I’d be willing to bet more than a few of you are using social networking sites to research candidates, whether you’re looking to find the best people–or weed out the worst. How can I be so sure? Well, 37 percent of employers reported they’re using social networking sites to research job seekers’ every online move, according to a new CareerBuilder survey of more than 2,000 hiring managers and HR professionals. But the motives for doing so are, just like job seekers’ reasons for using social media, extremely varied, and the number of employers and recruiters who admit they screen on social media versus those actually do is, I suspect, also quite different. Let’s take a closer look at what employers are looking for… and what they’re actually finding.
What kind of dirt are they digging up?
Though 12 percent of hiring managers say they’re using social media to find reasons not to hire a candidate, most say they’re trying to dig deeper than the traditional interview to find out:
- Whether the candidate presents himself/herself professionally – 65 percent
- If the candidate is a good fit for the company culture – 51 percent
- More about the candidate’s qualifications – 45 percent
- Whether the candidate is well-rounded – 35 percent
Who’s using social media recruiting most, and where?
- IT is the industry using it the most, at a whopping 52 percent. The least? Health care, at 28 percent.
- Employers are primarily using Facebook (65 percent) and LinkedIn (63 percent) to research candidates; 16 percent use Twitter.
Rosemary Haefner, vice president of human resources at CareerBuilder, cautions employers not to get too cozy with candidates’ online personas:
“Because social media is a dominant form of communication today, you can certainly learn a lot about a person by viewing their public, online personas. However, hiring managers and human resources departments have to make a careful, determined decision as to whether information found online is relevant to the candidates’ qualifications for the job.”
Are job seekers their own worst enemy when it comes to social?
Job candidates are using social media — that’s obviously not something that’s going to change anytime soon. However, things aren’t looking so good for many of them when it comes to employment: a third (34 percent) of hiring managers who currently research candidates on social media said they’ve found information that’s caused them to stop short in their tracks and run the other way.
There is a great opportunity for job seekers to become more aware of the public information they’re putting out there for the world — and their potential future employer — to see, and to start taking control of the message and use it to their job-seeking advantage rather than their detriment. After all, this type of behavior or information has already cost many candidates a job.
34 percent of employers said the following social media discoveries led to a candidate not getting the gig:
- Candidate posted provocative/inappropriate photos/info – 49 percent
- There was information about the candidate drinking or using drugs – 45 percent
- Candidate had poor communication skills – 35 percent
- Candidate bad mouthed previous employer – 33 percent
- Candidate made discriminatory comments related to race, gender, religion, or other – 28 percent
- Candidate lied about his or her qualifications – 22 percent
Getting employers to “Like” them
OK, OK, so many of you (ahem) may have found things that have caused you to shy away from hiring a candidate. And maybe you were looking for something to validate an opinion about a candidate you’d already formed. However, you likely don’t always use social media to screen candidates out: 29 percent of hiring managers said some discoveries have led to them extending a candidate an offer:
- They got a good feel for candidate’s personality – 58 percent
- Candidate conveyed a professional image –55 percent
- Background information supported candidate’s professional qualifications – 54 percent
- Candidate was well-rounded and showed a wide range of interests – 51 percent
- Candidate had great communication skills – 49 percent
- Candidate was creative – 44 percent
- Other people posted great references about the candidate – 34 percent.
Again, this is a great opportunity for job seekers to tailor the message to their advantage, and it’s also great for employers, as they may actually be able to get a view into not only the strongest aspects of a candidate’s professional reputation but also their personality. As Haefner stresses to job seekers, “Filter out anything that can tarnish your professional reputation and post communications, links and photos that portray you in the best possible light.”
Have you used social media to screen out a candidate, or to help give you the information you needed to make a hire? Share your story with us in the comments below.