Economy > Industries > SHRM 2012 > Talent Acquisition
The Impact of the U.S. Skills Gap and Vacancies on Revenue and Turnover
- July 3rd, 2012
- 6 Comments
Right now, there are more than 13.5 million unemployed people in the U.S. – but 2.5 million jobs are going unfilled every month. What’s going on here?
Our country is currently dealing with a talent crunch, or mismatch, of major proportions: There is a huge disconnect between what employers and job candidates perceive of one another, and it’s causing more jobs to go unfilled (and a lot of frustration).
Employers and candidates are misreading each other
While more than one-third of all companies have open positions which they can’t fill, many candidates are also having a hard time finding jobs for which they’re qualified. It turns out that employers and candidates are misinterpreting each other’s intentions and actions, leading to an increase, not a minimization, of the current skills gap.
See a side-by-side comparison of employer and candidate perceptions
Amazingly, 60 percent of companies are not doing anything about this, according to a new CareerBuilder Talent Crunch study among 1,648 U.S. hiring managers and human resource professionals and 2,036 U.S. job seekers.
The five areas U.S. enterprise organizations said are most difficult to recruit for are:
- Engineering – 67 percent
- C-level positions (CEO, CFO, CMO, etc.) – 60 percent
- Information Technology – 60 percent
- Research & Development – 54 percent
- Production – 54 percent
The talent crunch is taking a toll on employees, too
- One-third of employers (34 percent) reported that job vacancies have resulted in a lower quality of work due to employees being overworked.
- 23 percent cited a loss in revenue.
- 33 percent of employers said vacancies have caused lower morale, due to unfilled positions often translating into longer hours for existing staff.
- 17 percent pointed to higher turnover within their organizations.
Realigning job skills
Employers have a big responsibility to turn the tide. As Matt Ferguson, CEO of CareerBuilder, stresses, “If we want to see more positive movement in the U.S. market, we have to do a better job of realigning the skills of our labor force with positions that are in high demand. Prolonged vacancies can result in lower quality work, lower sales and morale, and can cause a delay in creating other related positions within the organization.”
As he adds, many employers are being proactive about the issue and taking steps to lessen the skills gap: “Fortunately, we see more companies taking matters into their own hands and putting programs in place to retrain and transition workers into their industries or fields.”
Watch Jamie Womack explain the current talent crunch at SHRM 2012
Training, stealing and stretching
Some employers are heeding this advice to secure talent for hard-to-fill positions, making plans for everything from new training tactics to poaching talent from their competitors:
- Fifty percent of employers of all sizes are planning to hire workers without experience in a particular industry or field and train them.
- Thirty-one percent are planning to cross-train current employees.
- 19 percent are targeting talent from competitors.
- Nearly two-thirds are willing to stretch incentives such as offering flexible hours (25 percent), higher salary (22 percent) and remote work options (15 percent).
Two in five companies (41 percent) reported they already have programs in place to help alleviate the skills gap, including on-the-job training, mentoring, and sending employees back to school.
The job seeker’s perspective
Many U.S. job seekers, especially those in industries hit hard by the recession, are being forced to explore new industries to find employment, and the transition isn’t always easy: Around 25 percent of unemployed workers have been laid off since 2008. As a result, nearly two-thirds (64 percent) knowingly apply for a position for which they don’t possess the required skills, just to try to find some kind of employment.
Despite these setbacks, job candidates are willing to learn new skills, compromise on benefit packages, and participate in training. Additionally, 77 percent said they would be willing to take a job in a different field than the one in which they currently work. More than half (54 percent) say they would be open to relocating to a new city or state.
Recommendations for employers
As an employer, there are four key ways you can begin to bridge the skills gap and help straighten out the current misperceptions of many job candidates:
- Reevaluate your organization’s training, re-training and re-skilling programs.
- Adopt a talent management philosophy for long-term, sustainable growth.
- Provide more productive feedback to candidates.
- Get smart about attracting and retaining top talent.
Get the full list of recommendations here.
Take a look at the stark contrast between employers’ and job seekers’ perceptions when it comes to everything from resume gaps to the current candidate pool:
Check out all of CareerBuilder’s Talent Crunch study findings and recommendations — and sign up for our upcoming webinar, The Talent Mismatch.
CareerBuilder’s Talent Crunch study was produced in conjunction with CareerBuilder’s “Empowering Employment” initiative, a partnership effort that showcases the programs and learnings of companies who are committed to retraining workers and fueling job creation.
About Amy Chulik McDonnell
Originally hailing from Ohio, Amy is a content strategist on the marketing and communications team who has been with both CareerBuilder and the city of Chicago for more than eight years. She writes on a range of recruitment topics on The Hiring Site, striving to bring a dose of clarity and humor to sometimes complicated issues around employee attraction, engagement and retention. The voice of @cbforemployers on Twitter, Amy also writes and edits content for the CareerBuilder website and CareerBuilder ebooks, emails, marketing campaigns, and more. When she's not working, Amy spends as much time as possible reading, cooking, writing short stories, eating Nutella out of the jar, waiting for CTA buses and trains, going to see her favorite bands live, and spending time with people who inspire and challenge her.Hi erickanow,
Thanks so much for the great comment, and I love that you were able to pull really interesting questions for future interviews. My only advice would be to be careful about how you word your questions -- if you put your potential employer too much on the defense right away and don't have context around your question, you may not get the answers you are seeking, and it may be hurtful to you in the interview. Maybe you can reference a statistic you read or something from an infographic like this, and relate it back to one of your questions in a positive way, to find out how the company is working to close the skills gap. Good luck!
I found that reading this article was helpful. Before I read this I did not have any questions waiting for my interviewers when they ask me, "Do you have any other questions(?)". I had nothing to say before like a silent dove. After reading this article I thought of 4 quick questions to ask on interviews. The first question is 'Are you willing to stretch incentives?'. Next, 'Has this company ever, and if so how often, DOES this company reevaluate its' workforce?'. The third question is 'How often does the hiring manager admit discrepancies in its' own hiring decisions?; and how often does the company realize mismatches and what is the policy regarding reskilling current employees rather than pink-slipping?'. The fourth question is, 'How often do you, as an interviewer, find great candidates that seem "born for" this type of work?; and were you ever wrong?'.
Trackbacks
Stay Connected
- May 2013 (10)
- April 2013 (23)
- March 2013 (14)
- February 2013 (20)
- January 2013 (15)
- December 2012 (10)
- November 2012 (16)
- October 2012 (18)
- September 2012 (16)
- August 2012 (20)
- July 2012 (23)
- June 2012 (15)
- May 2012 (22)
- April 2012 (15)
- March 2012 (15)
- February 2012 (16)
- January 2012 (17)
- December 2011 (16)
- November 2011 (18)
- October 2011 (15)
- September 2011 (18)
- August 2011 (18)
- July 2011 (24)
- June 2011 (20)
- May 2011 (15)
- April 2011 (19)
- March 2011 (24)
- February 2011 (16)
- January 2011 (20)
- December 2010 (18)
- November 2010 (13)
- October 2010 (14)
- September 2010 (20)
- August 2010 (15)
- July 2010 (25)
- June 2010 (19)
- May 2010 (11)
- April 2010 (18)
- March 2010 (19)
- February 2010 (17)
- January 2010 (17)
- December 2009 (12)
- November 2009 (17)
- October 2009 (17)
- September 2009 (12)
- August 2009 (16)
- July 2009 (18)
- June 2009 (22)
- May 2009 (12)
- April 2009 (12)
- March 2009 (16)
- February 2009 (24)
- January 2009 (19)
- December 2008 (19)
- November 2008 (21)
- October 2008 (25)
- September 2008 (17)
- August 2008 (14)
- July 2008 (16)
- June 2008 (11)
- May 2008 (10)
- Benefits
- BLS
- careerbuilder
- CareerBuilder Survey
- Company Culture
- Corporate Philanthropy
- Economic Climate
- Economy
- Employee Benefits
- Employee Engagement
- Employee Morale
- Employment Branding
- Employment Branding
- empowering employment
- Facebook
- Generational Hiring
- Generation Y
- Gen Y
- Health Care
- Hiring
- Hiring Forecast
- Interview Questions
- Job Forecast
- Laid Off Workers
- Layoffs
- Leadership
- Leadership Development
- Matt Ferguson
- Millenials
- onboarding
- recession
- Recruiting
- Retention
- SHRM 2009
- SHRM Annual Conference
- skills gap
- Social Media
- Social Networking
- Social Recruiting
- Survey Results
- Talent Acquisition
- Telecommuting
- Twitter
- Work/Life Balance
- work life balance
Subscribe
- May 2013 (10)
- April 2013 (23)
- March 2013 (14)
- February 2013 (20)
- January 2013 (15)
- December 2012 (10)
- November 2012 (16)
- October 2012 (18)
- September 2012 (16)
- August 2012 (20)
- July 2012 (23)
- June 2012 (15)
- May 2012 (22)
- April 2012 (15)
- March 2012 (15)
- February 2012 (16)
- January 2012 (17)
- December 2011 (16)
- November 2011 (18)
- October 2011 (15)
- September 2011 (18)
- August 2011 (18)
- July 2011 (24)
- June 2011 (20)
- May 2011 (15)
- April 2011 (19)
- March 2011 (24)
- February 2011 (16)
- January 2011 (20)
- December 2010 (18)
- November 2010 (13)
- October 2010 (14)
- September 2010 (20)
- August 2010 (15)
- July 2010 (25)
- June 2010 (19)
- May 2010 (11)
- April 2010 (18)
- March 2010 (19)
- February 2010 (17)
- January 2010 (17)
- December 2009 (12)
- November 2009 (17)
- October 2009 (17)
- September 2009 (12)
- August 2009 (16)
- July 2009 (18)
- June 2009 (22)
- May 2009 (12)
- April 2009 (12)
- March 2009 (16)
- February 2009 (24)
- January 2009 (19)
- December 2008 (19)
- November 2008 (21)
- October 2008 (25)
- September 2008 (17)
- August 2008 (14)
- July 2008 (16)
- June 2008 (11)
- May 2008 (10)
- Benefits
- BLS
- careerbuilder
- CareerBuilder Survey
- Company Culture
- Corporate Philanthropy
- Economic Climate
- Economy
- Employee Benefits
- Employee Engagement
- Employee Morale
- Employment Branding
- Employment Branding
- empowering employment
- Generational Hiring
- Generation Y
- Gen Y
- Health Care
- Hiring
- Hiring Forecast
- Interview Questions
- Job Forecast
- Laid Off Workers
- Layoffs
- Leadership
- Leadership Development
- Matt Ferguson
- Millenials
- onboarding
- recession
- Recruiting
- Retention
- SHRM 2009
- SHRM Annual Conference
- skills gap
- Social Media
- Social Networking
- Social Recruiting
- Survey Results
- Talent Acquisition
- Telecommuting
- Work/Life Balance
- work life balance




















[...] and “adopt a talent management philosophy for long-term, sustainable growth.” Article News Date: July 3, [...]
[...] While many experts blame a lack of skills on the worker side, recent research indicates that the difference between how employers and candidates think and behave is contributing to the problem. In other words, there is a fundamental gap between how recruiters [...]
[...] While many experts blame a lack of skills on the worker side, recent research indicates that the difference between how employers and job seekers think and behave is contributing to the problem. In other words, there is a fundamental gap between how recruiters [...]
[...] While many experts blame a lack of skills on the worker side, recent research indicates that the difference between how employers and candidates think and behave is contributing to the problem. In other words, there is a fundamental gap between how recruiters [...]